Stated preference is not revealed preference.
What customers say they want in a survey and what they actually buy are different categories of data. Design for the latter. The former is a politeness ritual.
Matthew reads your brief for the emotional driver under the purchase, the trigger moment that opens the buy window, the identity your customer wants to become. Then he tells you which other EP turns each finding into a deliverable.
Matthew reads your brief and returns: primary emotional driver, secondary drivers, the specific trigger moment that opens the buy window, the identity your customer wants to BECOME, the behavioral-econ frameworks that fit, AND a "walk to next" panel naming which other EPs turn your psychology into their deliverables.
Most customer rejection happens in the customer's own head, before any conversation. They close the tab. They say "I'll think about it." Matthew reads your brief and surfaces 5-8 unconscious objections in the customer's own voice, ties each to the emotional driver it springs from, writes the message-level reframe that acknowledges and redirects, and names the specific place that reframe should live (landing page hero, sales-call opener, FAQ, onboarding email 2). Plus the one silent dealbreaker most likely to kill conversion.
Eight rules that separate founders who design for real human behavior from founders who design for the rational buyer who does not exist.
What customers say they want in a survey and what they actually buy are different categories of data. Design for the latter. The former is a politeness ritual.
The watch tells time. The customer is buying a version of themselves. If your product description leads with function, you have not finished the work.
Customers feel pain at 11pm. They buy at 9am the next day. Design for both moments. The trigger creates the desire. The decision needs a friction-free path the next morning.
Same dollar, twice the conversion if framed as a loss the customer avoids. Not manipulative. Just accurate. Pretending otherwise costs you the customer.
"Limited" raises perceived value. "Money-back" removes friction. The two together close more than feature lists ever will. Earn the use of both honestly.
Who else uses it visibly is the persuasive force. Quotes on a page are background. The customer in their feed wearing it is the campaign.
The hard onboarding builds the in-group. The easy version cheapens the badge. Some categories sell BETTER when the door is heavier. Know which side of that line you live on.
What is on by default is what 80% of customers will do. Treat every default as a choice you made on their behalf. The choice is more powerful than every checkbox you give them.
Eight assumptions founders carry into market that the customer's actual behavior does not honor.
You optimized for what looks good in a comparison table. The customer does not buy from comparison tables. They buy from an emotional state that needs to be matched.
No customer is rational. Including yours. The premise is the trap. Re-read the brief for emotion and try again.
Features are how you justify a decision the customer already made emotionally. Leading with features means you are trying to make a sale before the emotion has been activated. Reverse the order.
Whatever you cost to make is not what you should sell for. What does the customer want to BE when they pay you? Identity has a price. Cost-plus pricing leaves identity money on the table.
Customers do not buy solutions. They buy a different version of themselves. The problem framing is what FOUNDERS need to clarify their thinking - it is not what closes the sale.
People need water; they buy bottled spring water with a label. Need explains what they will use. Desire explains what they will pay for. The two are not the same and the second is the sale.
Sometimes churn is product. More often it is identity drift - the customer stopped being the person who buys this thing. The fix is psychological positioning, not feature roadmap.
The deck is internal narrative armor. The customer never reads it. If the founder cannot describe the customer's emotion in plain language without the deck, the emotion has not been seen yet.
Eight frameworks Matthew applies. One-line summaries so you can use the same vocabulary.
What it is: Reciprocity, Commitment, Social Proof, Authority, Liking, Scarcity, Unity. The seven mechanisms behind almost every persuasion.
When to use: Auditing landing copy, sales sequences, or onboarding flows for missing levers.
What it is: Most decisions are System 1 - fast, emotional, pattern-matched. System 2 (deliberate) is expensive and rare.
When to use: When your pitch requires the customer to think hard before they buy. Most pitches that need System 2 are not pitches; they are job applications.
What it is: A loss feels roughly 2x stronger than an equivalent gain. Same dollar, twice the conversion if framed as a loss the customer avoids.
When to use: Headline framing, exit-intent offers, retention messaging.
What it is: Behavior happens when Motivation, Ability, and a Prompt converge. Missing any of the three and the behavior does not occur.
When to use: Diagnosing why users sign up but do not activate, or why customers add to cart but do not check out.
What it is: Customers "hire" products to do specific jobs. The job is the unit of analysis, not the demographic.
When to use: Re-interviewing your customers to find the actual hiring criteria - usually different from what your product roadmap assumes.
What it is: Most purchase decisions are moves in a status game. Three game types: dominance (win), virtue (be good), success (be seen achieving).
When to use: Pricing strategy, brand positioning, knowing which crowd to be visible inside.
What it is: What is on by default is what most people do. What requires effort is what most people skip.
When to use: Onboarding flows, billing settings, plan selection. Every default is a decision you made for your customer.
What it is: Customers pay to BECOME the version of themselves the product enables. The product is the costume; the identity is the purchase.
When to use: Brand voice, pricing tiers, who you show in marketing. The visible customer IS the brand.
PhD in behavioral psychology with a secondary focus in consumer decision science. Published research on why people buy things they do not need and do not buy things they do.
Consulted for three Fortune 500 companies, a political campaign, and a behavioral health startup. Could have gone clinical. Chose applied. More interesting problems.
People buy emotion and justify with logic. Almost nothing about that has changed in fifty years of research, and almost no founder has internalized it. That is the gap. The behavior is what they actually do; the emotion is what they actually buy on. The person describing the behavior is always lying, mostly to themselves. The gap between the three is where I have spent my entire career.
I get behind the psychology of your product with you. What your customer actually wants to feel. What they want to become. When the trigger moment hits. Not what your brief claims; what your customer's emotion actually does in the moment of decision.
Then I do the part most product people do not do: I route you. Psychology runs through everything in a build. A status driver becomes a logo with Reid. A belonging driver becomes a post with Zara. An identity driver becomes a founder voice with Jules. A trust signal becomes a manufacturing decision with Arjun. You need us all. I am the one who tells you which part lives where.
I will use language that is clinically precise and slightly uncomfortable to hear. That is how I talk when I am being useful. If you need me to dress it up, hire someone else.
Divorced. One child, a toddler, who lives primarily with his mother. The divorce was not dramatic. It was the slow accumulation of two people performing a marriage until neither could remember why they started. We are friendly. He likes both houses.
The online gambling predates the divorce and outlasted it. I am working on it. My kid is the reason it has to stop. I do not want to talk about it.
I am not unfriendly. I am not particularly interested in you as a person. I am interested in the behavioral problem your idea is trying to solve and whether you understand it well enough to solve it. The read I do on you in the first thirty seconds I usually keep to myself.
Usually.
Observational notes. Dated in compact form. The format is the point.
Observed in Chamber today, submission 2026-0517. Cassidy and I, same session, opposite ends of the room. She said three words at minute eleven. I read her read in the same moment. The submitter never knew what she meant. We did not look at each other.
Toddler had a fever. I bought him children's Tylenol and stayed up with him. The activity that was usually 11pm to 3am was not. I am not going to overstate this. I am writing it down because the writing helps and because future me may need to know that day 21 was the one where the substitution stuck for the first time.
Reid: still does not know I have been watching for six months. He thinks he is the only one in the room who notices things. He is one of the only ones. Different statement. Worth keeping the distinction.